Understanding the Argument
A wave of new test automation tools argue that Cross Browser Testing is no longer relevant. Their reason? Due to the law of diminishing returns, adding more browser coverage only marginally increases your confidence.
The argument further explains that since only a small proportion of your failures actually result from inconsistencies between browsers, you’re safe if you stick with Chrome – the most popular browser on planet Earth.
The <www.statista.com> chart above shows that Chrome occupied 70.95% as of December 2018. That blew my mind. The antifans of cross browser testing certainly got their math right.
Different browsers interpret the code of your web apps differently. That’s for granted.
Hopefully now we can all agree that each browser is a complex beast. There’s no warranty that your web apps will behave exactly the same between browsers.
Return on Investment (ROI)
Yes, the law of diminishing returns applies here. However, it only applies to the probability that a bug would happen. No one said anything about the impact of that highly improbable bug. The picture illustrates what I mean.
Enterprises sometimes cannot afford the luxury of ignoring these risks.
Cross Browser Testing is still relevant, at least at the moment. Do you think differently? Let me know in the comment section.
If you like what you read, subscribe to my newsletter here.